Crowd Sourcing Rangeland Vegetation Conditions

Project Description

This project  crowdsourced information from pastoralists on local vegetation and forage conditions to improve rangeland models being used in the region to monitor for drought-related forage anomalies. 

Research Overview

Migrant pastoralists on the arid and semi-arid rangelands (ASAL) of East Africa scratch out a livelihood in a harsh environment where most households depend on livestock to make a living. While the over 8 million pastoralists in Ethiopia and 3 million in Kenya have the potential to make productive use of the vast ASAL as a source of livestock products like milk, meat and skins for markets in the growing cities of East Africa and beyond, they are facing critical challenges due to climate change and land pressures. Regular droughts can kill off vast numbers of livestock, threatening not only the economic viability of the ASAL, but the very food security and survival of its inhabitants.

This project pulls together inputs from machine learning and image classification, rangeland ecology, remote sensing, and applied economics and finance to leverage emerging technologies for the benefit of some of the poorest and most vulnerable people on Earth. While crowd-sourcing applications continue to grow rapidly, still relatively rare are projects that combine systematic data collection with sophisticated real-time analysis both to provide feedback into the source system and for other uses.

 

Research Activities and Findings

We trained 103 pastoralists in Isiolo County, Kenya, to collect and submit information on rangeland conditions and forage patalability The survey used icons and audio, allowing for illiterate contributors, and ran on simple smartphones, which the project trained on and provided. We also provided participants with budget smartphones and small solar chargers. Over the following 6 months, those participants successfully submitted over 110,000 surveys.

To learn how to address prospective data issues related to non-random sampling (clustered submissions) and poor quality submissions, we developed a research design that included two randomized control trials.  The first trial varied the rewards a participant received for making a successful submissions across space and time, and between participants.  The reward structures were communicated to participants via a custom developed map that segmented the project area into reward regions, which we could update remotely. The second trial provided varying intensities of feedback to the contributors on their submissions.  In the most intense case, submissions of poor quality were manual flagged and their authors were notified of their rate of poor quality submissions.     

 

Analysis of the distribution of submissions showed that our approach of varying rewards successfully reduced clustering of submissions and the feedback treatments improved submission quality along some dimensions of quality.  We are currently using the submissions and accompanying images to characterize landcover classes produced by an unsupervised classification of remotely sensed data in the region.  

 

Outputs

 

Blogs and media mentions

 

Implementing Partners

  • Cornell University

Funded by

Project Timeline

  • 2016 - 2018

Contact

  • ​Nathaniel Jensen

cgiar.png
  • Facebook - Grey Circle
  • Twitter - Grey Circle
  • YouTube - Grey Circle
  • Flickr - Grey Circle

By entering and continuing to use this site you agree to our treatment of your data.

See the ILRI privacy statement for more information.